Group dynamics are a difficult thing but it’s noticeable that Friday afternoon, when the owner and I are on our own in the shop, is more productive and relaxing than most other days. We’ve known each other for over 30 years (he is more sociable than I am and came over to introduce himself at an antiques fair we were both standing at Granby Halls) and it’s a bit like being married – as long as I do what I’m told it all goes well.
Granby Halls was demolished 20 years ago, how time flies. I’ve just looked it up and am amazed by how historic it was – I’d have taken more notice of it if I’d realised. If you have read the article behind the link you will now know what me, Mick Jagger and Sir Oswald Moseley have in common.
This isn’t to say that we don’t get on when all three of us are in, but it’s different. Personally, we have no problems, but I don’t feel we work as well as we could do as a group. When there are two of us we work as boss and peasant and it all goes quite well, as I see my role as doing what I’m told and being paid for it. With an extra person there, we seem to lose focus. He’s not yet been beaten down sufficiently by life to take on the roll of a peasant.

Shakespeare £2 coin – comedy. I put it in here because I fulfi8l the role of Fool to the owner’s Lear, though I don’t actually call him Nuncle. NOt that Lear is a comedy, but I thought the hat and rattle fitted here.
One of the things that influences my attitudes to groups is that I’ve been fortunate to be in some good teams over the years – nearly always by accident, as they seem to form and then become successful without a lot of talk or planning. The key thing, I think, is that “a star team will always outperform a team of stars“. Once you’ve been in a good team it becomes easier to become part of another.
I’ve also been in one or two bad teams over the years , such as the rugby club committee where the Chairman eventually fell out with us and resigned, taking the post protectors with him. We had to run round and borrow a set for Saturday. If I were writing a play about a dysfunctional Rugby League team I wouldn’t dare include that in the script because it’s so hard to believe.
You’re right about teams. A good team knows each other’s strengths and nobody’s out for glory. I’ve been on a team like that and also in that Dilbert cartoon….
🙂
I was in a wonderful team/group when I was student and it has made it hard for other groups that I have been in to come up to the same standard.
Yes, it does set a benchmark, doesn’t it!
I agree completely that the ruler/peasant dichotomy works well if both are within the range of ‘at least okay’. I was a stagemaneger on quite a few shows, which means that the director/deity made up the way he or she wanted that world to be and what results s/he wanted, and it was my job to Make It So in whatever way worked. There is something very reassuring to me about a sane structure at least partially provided by others, almost like if society or families worked well–it’s ace when the workplace is like that.
I have 28 months before retirement age – frighteningly short in some ways – but a long time to be unhappy at work. I am fortunate I enjoy it. 🙂
I want the dysfunctional rugby script
I saw the play . . .
😉
You are right, “a star team will always outperform a team of stars“. As for life beating one down enough to make one happy as a peasant, I am reminded of an old Dilbert cartoon.
https://dilbert.com/strip/2003-02-16
Ah, Lavinia, that was my second belly laugh of the day! And it started with the first frame!
It is a fine cartoon.
Yes, I laughed, and then I considered it and compared it to my life . . .
I think we have all been “numbed” to some degree….gets us through life. 🙂
🙂
I really must examine my coins more closely
You don’t see many commemoratives about – people store them at home – this is known as seigneurage (there are various spellings) and offers a financial advantage to the government. Wikipedia explains it better than I do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seigniorage