The Head of Oliver Cromwell

 

Cromwell’s statue in St Ives – the Huntingdonshire town, not the Cornish one, as noted on several internet captions. What do they teach them in schools today?

Although these days we tend to think of body parts as something to be treated with reverence, and even something to be returned to the cultures to which they belong, this hasn’t always been the case.

Some of the mistreatment was simply casual, life was cheap, and bodies were not always accorded the respect we now give them. When you see the way living people, including children were treated during the Industrial Revolution it’s hardly surprising that dead ones were treated worse. Old bones were used industrially – the bones of Waterloo were burned for charcoal to process sugar beet, British buyers toured Europe to buy battlefield bones for processing into fertiliser and human teeth from battlefield corpses were reused as dentures. These were actually known as Waterloo teeth – an early form of marketing, though most of the early ones came from other battlefields, or even from executed criminals. George Washington, famously bought nine teeth from slaves. By the latter part of the century there was substantial trade in these teeth – first to the USA after the Napoleonic Wars, then to Europe after the American Civil War released a glut of teeth onto the market.

Some was deliberate, either to make a political point by displaying the heads or body parts of traitors, or by mutilation, preventing entry to the afterlife. This was done to John Wycliffe, the Vicar of Lutterworth in Leicestershire, In 1428, 44 years after he died, he was declared a heretic, his body was exhumed, his remains burned and the ashes scattered in the River Swift.

In the Middle Ages many religious relics were used as a basis for an early form of tourism, as pilgrims visited shrines to see the relics, bringing offerings to the church and money to the local area. Peterborough, for instance, had an arm of St Oswald, which brought in much revenue and was guarded by a monk day and night. They were, of course, sensitive to the possibility of theft , as that was how they obtained the arm in the first place. Winegot, a monk from Peterborough, had a dream in which St Oswald’s arm asked him to take it somewhere it would be appreciated, so he stole the arm from Bamburgh Priory some time before 1066. It was later seized by Hereward the Wake, who lodged it in Ramsey Abbey. It was returned when the Abbot of Peterborough threatened to attack and burn the abbey at Ramsey. The Church was very different in those days.

Later, dismemberment, in the form of hanging drawing and quartering, was used as a punishment for treason, and although it seems like something from the distant past it was only in 1782 that the last man in England was executed in this way. David Tyrie was a clerk in the Royal Navy who was tried and executed for holding a treasonous correspondence with the French. They used to nail the body parts to town gates to discourage further crime, though Tyrie was buried on the spot he was hanged. However, this isn’t a history of execution, so I will get back to Cromwell.

Anyway, back to Cromwell’s head. He was a local man (now that I am living in Peterborough), born and schooled in Huntingdon, with links to St Ives and Ely. He stopped a convoy of silver leaving Cambridge for the King at the start of the Civil War, raised a Troop of Horse, which arrived late for the Battle of Edgehill, and embarked on a military career that would see him win numerous victories before, in 1649, taking a lead in the execution of King Charles I and becoming Lord Protector.

On his ascent to the throne in 1660, Charles II took a practical, and generous view, of the events before his Restoration, which was enshrined in law as the Indemnity and Oblivion Act of 1660. The act was a relief to many supporters of Parliament, who were spared punishment, and a disappointment to many loyal Royalists, who were not able to get their property back, even though the lands of the Crown and Church were returned by the act. In all, 104 people were exempted from the general amnesty, of whom 24 had already died (although excluding them did allow the Crown to seize their property). Nor did it save some of them from further punishment. Cromwell, Henry Ireton and John Bradshaw were all subject to posthumous executions, their bodies being dug up and displayed at Tyburn before being beheaded (it reportedly took eight blows of an axe to remove Cromwell’s head). Their remains were cast into a pit below the gallows. Cromwell and Ireton had been embalmed before burial, Bradshaw had not, a point that will become important later in the story. The heads were mounted on spikes which were fastened to the roof of Westminster Hall, where King Charles I had been condemned in 1649. The date of the posthumous beheadings was 30 January 1661, 12 years to the day after the execution of King Charles I.

Cromwell’s statue in St Ives, Huntingdonshire. In 1932 several local lads attached a yo-yo to the finger. In my youth I knew two of the miscreants. They claimed it had been a sensation in its day and had made the front pages of the papers. A search of the archives suggest it was not quite so newsworthy.

Cromwell’s son Richard, who succeeded his father as Lord Protector, was not, it may surprise you to learn, punished after the Restoration. He spent around 20 years in voluntary exile in Europe, but returned to England, where he lived in Hertfordshire until his death, at the age of , in 1714.

Ireton had tenuous local links – being Cromwell’s son-in-law and being responsible for building a military road across the Fens, now part of the A142 between Mepal and Chatteris – still known as Ireton’s Way. Another regicide with local links was Valentine Walton, Cromwell’s brother-in-law. He came from Great Staughton, near Huntingdon and fled the country at the Restoration, dying in Flanders in 1661 whilst working as a gardener.

Cromwell’s head, bound in iron, stayed in place until a storm in 1684 blew it down, where a sentry found it on the ground and took it home. A reward was offered for the return of the head, which was considered a significant national relic but it remained hidden until 1710, when it was displayed in a private museum in London. The owner, Claudius du Puy, claimed it was worth 60 Guineas at that time, about £12,000 today.

In the late 18th Century, the head was in the possession of Samuel Russell said to be a descendent of Cromwell and “a failed comic actor and drunkard”. He sold it to James Cox (1723-1800), a jeweller, and maker of automata, in 1787. Cox was an interesting character who, at one time, had his own museum. He appears to have pursued Cromwell’s head for many years and was only able to buy it after closing his museum, so he never displayed it. His most famous creation is The Peacock Clock, which was built for Catherine the Great and is still on display in the Hermitage Museum.

Cox paid £100 for the head, about £14,000 when adjusted for inflation. He sold it in 1797 to the Hughes brothers, who were putting together a collection of Cromwell memorabilia for display in Bond Street. It cost them £230 (about £25,000 when adjusted). Their exhibition was not a success, partly due to gaps in the provenance and the resulting rumours that the head was a fake.

The fact that there were two “Cromwell Heads” in existence didn’t help, though as any student of relics can tell you, this is not unusual. Both St Oswald and St John the Baptist, have had their supposed heads on display in four different churches at the same time.

It was said, by John Cranch, who promoted the exhibition for the Hughes brothers, that Cromwell’s was “the only instance of a head cut off and spiked that had before been embalmed; which is precisely the case with respect to the head in question”. This was, in general, true, as traitors were normally executed while they were alive and unembalmed. Unfortunately, Ireton’s body had also been embalmed before execution, leaving room for doubt. A letter from John Constable in 1799 says

Smith’s friend, Clanch has left off painting, at least for the present. His whole time and thoughts are occupied in exhibiting an old, rusty, fusty head with a spike in it, which he declares to be the real embalmed head of Oliver Cromwell. Where he got it, I know not.; ’tis to be seen in Bond Street at half a crown admittance.’

It passed to the Wilkinson family in 1815 and remained in their possession until 1960. It was examined several times over the years, notably 1911 and the 1930s, as was the other head in the Ashmolean Museum. The Ashmolean head had not been embalmed and the spike had been driven in from the top, so it was clearly a fake.

The other head was authentic, in that it had been embalmed after death but before beheading and the spike had been driven up from below. The spike (seen in the picture of the Wilkinson head) is from a contemporary pike with the langets (steel reinforcing strips) and remains of the pike shaft being clearly shown.

Canon Wilkinson with the head

When the head blew down in 1684 it was known to be Cromwell’s as the positions of the heads were known. That was why the reward was offered. Cranial measurements suggested it was Cromwell, though some doubt remained due to the possibility that it was Ireton’s head. In the end, the experts, after compiling a 109 page report, concluded that the head did belong to Oliver Cromwell.

In 1960, the Wilkinson family contacted Sidney Sussex College, which Cromwell had attended, and it was agreed that the college would become the new custodian of the head, which would be buried, rather than displayed to the public. It was buried, in the oak box which had contained it since 1815. The interment took place at a small private ceremony in 1960 and was announced two years later.

 

A Growing Realisation

It’s traditional for people to be too hard on themselves. As a look at my career trajectory (which reached its stuttering height around 1988, faltered and commenced a steady decline which lasted for 38 years) will show, I’m not one of those people. I had everything I wanted and I didn’t try. Laziness and lack of ambition were all I needed, and as a result I coasted into retirement with very little to show for it but a finely honed ability for world class procrastination.

When the book is closed on my life, it will be with the phrase that often adorned my school reports – “could do better”.

Still, there’s no point worrying now.

However, I must do better in one respect. I took Julia to wood turning this morning, and, as last week, came back by a slightly circuitous route that avoided the queues. As with last week I had a number of thoughts of subjects for poems (including some of the same ones I had had last week) and realised that I had done nothing about it. I’ve written about Air Sea Rescue in WW2 and about the fate of Cromwell’s head after his posthumous execution, but no actual creative writing has been done. This is not good.

At the moment I can pass it off as a change of pace, or relaxation. I have plenty of material in hand and October is a slow month for submissions, but I really have to get a grip after that.

Does anybody want to know what happened to Cromwell’s head, by the way? There’s been a lot written about him while he was alive, but not much about him after he died. To be fair, he did do a lot more while he was alive.

 

Days Falling Like Leaves From a Tree

Sorry, it’s been a while. If I list all the small tasks I have done in the last five days it looks like slightly less than a morning’s work. As for the 1,500 word article I wrote about Air Sea Rescue, I could realistically have done it in a day if I had kept the research in bounds. I didn’t, and the time flew by. So, a day and a half’s work spreading to five days. I suppose you think I spent some of the remaining time in creative pursuits. I didn’t.

If this were a film, I would now post a picture of calendars turning over, or leaves falling from autumn trees. As I lack an appropriate calendar, and the leaves aren’t actually falling yet, I can’t do that.

I did a bit of decluttering. You can’t tell, because it was mostly throwing away waste paper such as old envelopes and notes where I can’t read my own writing. It came to two small bins, which isn’t a lot compared to the bulk I need to shift. Inn fact, if you look at it terms of the space it takes up, the clutter I binned, compared to the journals that were delivered, leave me with more than I started with. It’s not an inspiring thought.

It’s time to have a serious word with myself. One change I’m going to make is to remove decluttering from my vocabulary and talk about reducing clutter. A slight change of emphasis meaning that I have to have less clutter at the end of the week compared to the beginning.  This needs to happen, as I have a declining supply of days and a seemingly inexorable flood of clutter.

Having decided that, I am going to go and have lunch.

Mr Darcy, a Tanka Prose and Musings on Mortality

Here’s a tanka prose, recently published in drifting sands Haibun (dsh). For those of you wanting to read more poetry, the issue can be found here. Scroll down a bit, marvel at the photo and press the button for Issue 37.

It was originally titled Mr Darcy Grows Old and Crochety but things moved on. Mrs Bennet had an automaton bird in a cage in an earlier version, which introduced the concept of a gilded cage. I kept to allusion to the gilded cage as editing moved on.

This one pretty much wrote itself as I built it from things I knew of the novel and, from the start, wanted to use the word “oleaginous”. The opening line is a blatant case of larceny and the rest seemed to flow from there. After a quick fact check and a suitable poem, it was done. I feel it could have been done a little better by someone with a greater knowledge of Austen, but you can’t have everything. Sometimes you just have to do your best and move on.  It is, after all, light verse, rather than a scholarly study.

Even Gilt May Tarnish

“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a married man in possession of a good
fortune, must be in want of a hobby, for he certainly pays no heed to the wishes of his
wife,” said Lizzy Darcy, stabbing her needlepoint with much meaning, and not a little peril
to her thimble.

“Bingley is much the same, dear sister; if he cannot shoot it, mount it or bet on it, it holds
very little interest for him.”

“You may wish to moderate those words, dear Jane,” said her mother, “lest a passing
novelist should weave them into unfortunate innuendo. I know that I have never quite
recovered from the cruel way that the odious Austen woman quoted me in her novels, and
my poor nerves are threadbare as a result. I hate to think what your poor father would
have said.”

She reached for the bell pull to request another sherry.

The girls rolled their eyes, knowing full well what Mr Bennet would have said.

“I’m not sure,” muttered Jane, taking advantage of her mother’s deafness, “that I shall ever
forgive the oleaginous Collins for evicting dear mama from Longbourn and inflicting her
presence upon us. Even Bingley does not have a good word for him.”

“I, on the other hand, have a very good word for him,” said Mr Darcy, slipping through the
door from the library in search of comestibles, “the man’s a complete and utter . . .”

At that point the blushes of the ladies, and the reader, were spared by the creaking of the
ancient butler entering through the main doors.

only gods stay
flawless slim and beautiful
the twilight of
us mortals dims our eyes
to lines and imperfections

 

No photos today.

Keeping Count (217/256)

Although I’ve been relaxing, I see this will be my 217th post of the year, on the 256th day. It means I’m 39 posts off my original target of averaging one a day, but it has allowed me to relax with the rest of my writing, which seems to have helped things along.

Nothing of note happened yesterday.  We had a good cooked breakfast instead of a puny fibre and fruit filled bowl of sensible goodness, but we had it as brunch, so kept the calories down that way.  I had an email telling me two of my haiku were being retained for further consideration. This releases enough rejects for me to compile my last submission of the month. It does not, however, raise much hope as my previous experience of being short-listed does not provide much reason for optimism. But you never know.

 

The Heron is back again. Arnot Hill Park

I did the shopping online this afternoon and have ordered a number of healthy things. Now that the cooler weather is here we find ourselves feeling more like cooking. The kitchen gets quite a lot of afternoon sun and can be uncomfortable. I’m toying with the idea of some form of shade, particularly if the weather is likely to get hotter. In the old days I would have rigged up a pergola, but these days we will need a builder, and once you have a builder you end up subsidising his lavish lifestyle and the bills pile up. I can buy a retractable awning for only £3,800 according to an advert I just read, but that doesn’t include fitting. It’s a lot to pay for a cooler kitchen.

A more economic answer may be the one we chose this summer – eat salad. You can’t suffer from the heat of the kitchen if making tea consists of pulling salad out of the fridge.

Cormorant

 

Rejection Again

Sometimes in blogging, inspiration arrives erratically and in quantity. That is why I can now move swiftly from a definition of “Senior Moment” onto rejection. I’ve already covered it recently in my comments on the record-breaking rejection I had last week, so I won’t labour the point.

I wasn’t expecting this rejection as I almost always end up with an acceptance from this magazine, and because I considered the poems to be good. But it was a guest editor and they can be unpredictable.

I never time these things, but it was a matter of minutes before I was onto other things. I returned, briefly to the subject as i sat with Julia at breakfast and I am now back to other things. I have returned to it for this post, but only to give a little context to my remarks. It’s possible that in years to come I may write a satirical novel featuring a mad pensioner who dedicates his last few years to ruining the lives of editors who turned him down, only to realise he’d have been better writing poetry.  It would allow me to be rude about some of the foibles of editors, and to point out the importance of looking forward.

I have just spent an enjoyable half hour looking at other places to send poetry. I’m not sure if they are all for me, but it’s always good to look round and try something new. It’s easy to get into a rut when everything seems to be working nicely and you need the occasional prompt to do something different.

Having read some good poetry whilst doing so, I also want to up my writing game, so there are several positives to take from every set-back.

The only thing that worries me is that, having written what I thought was some of my best poetry for months, I get turned down by other journals that usually accept me and find I have taken an evolutionary wrong turn.

What is a Senior Moment?

Tomorrow I will give you my definition of “senior moment”.

It has moved on from “tomorrow” and this is the second attempt, as it wasn’t quite as easy to pin down as precisely as I wanted to. Basically, a senior moment is much like a mistake, but with a touch of pathos, and traces of decay and self pity.

Julia by the Canal

Looking for a line to use about senior moments, I would define them as mistakes made with a Shakespearean flourish. They don’t require three witches or three daughters an eye of newt or a blasted heath, but they do require a touch of pathos and a recognition that faculties are faltering, if not actually failing.

It is probably easier to say what is not a senior moment. It really also needs to be relatable, without being commonplace, and to lend itself to becoming an anecdote. A simple error copying a date wrongly, for instance, will not do. We all do it and it doesn’t require age to make it happen. It also tends to lack a beginning, a middle and an end with any significance.

They vary, I suppose, from person to person. I, for instance, have laboured over the years with trying to remember names. As a salesman, and an antiques dealer, it was a useful skill and I developed a scheme for remembering them. Now that I’m retired, and can default to my normal position of not caring what people are called, it’s just something I have always done, rather than a failing of age. The fact that I have stopped trying to remember  is probably a function of age, but that is just curmudgeonly disregard for others, rather than a senior moment. I’ve met enough people, I don’t need to remember them all.

Julia, Sutton-on-Sea

For some of you reading, who actually like people and who remember names easily, forgetting a name is probably a notable event.

Does anyone have any comments?

The pictures of Julia, by the way, do not represent mental decline, they were just some i hadn’t used for a while.

 

A Reflection on Age and Memory

Today started with me examining the wreckage of my latest senior moment. However, the first thing I concluded was that it wasn’t a senior moment. It was just a mistake.

 

I’ve been worrying about making mistakes recently as i have made a few. I made the same submission to a magazine two days apart last month, forgetting I had already done it. Before that I prepared a submission and forgot to send it, which was a nuisance. Some months before that I sent the same poem to two different editors, which is a bad thing to do as it means writing to withdraw the poem as soon as you know you’ve done it. This is, I’m sure, irritating to the editor and makes me look like an idiot.  As I make more and more mistakes, I have begun to worry about my declining mental faculties and wonder about dementia. My mum had Parkinson’s and my dad had dementia. I don’t really want either.

In truth, as you get older you do get a little vaguer, which is why I have a pocket diary. I’m still not sure whether I had long COVID or not, which wouldn’t have helped. Then, as Julia says, I am disorganised and don’t get enough sleep. And I do submit a lot of poems.

Last year I made 78 submissions. This year I have already done 79 and will probably manage 100.  It’s not surprising I’m making mistakes. However, I am organising myself better. Apart from cutting out the mistakes this is already allowing me more time to write and, as a result, things are already going better.

Well, until today.  I was getting the submission together and called up the magazine’s website, as every magazine seems to have its own requirements. This makes submitting a touch irksome at times (particularly when they change them without telling you) I presume it makes the editing process easier. That seems fair. I have a handful of poems to cope with, they have thousands.

Anyway, when I checked this morning, I found I’d missed the submission date. It was last month, not this month. I presume it was a copying error when I was making the submission plan for the year. That, I think, is actually just a mistake and not a senior moment. And that is where we started.

Tomorrow I will give you my definition of “senior moment”.

Photos are wood turning by Julia – at least she goes from strength to strength in retirement. 🙂

Pessimism, Problems and Poetry

I’m on a 100 day activity streak, but there were no fireworks or streamers, so it is pretty much like Day 99, or probably Day 101. To be honest, next month will mark the 12th anniversary of my time here and 100 days isn’t really worth getting worked up about. However, it does give me something to write about.

The office light turned into an even bigger nuisance when we found the bathroom light had also given up (it has been flickering intermittently for a while). However, when we found the bedroom light had gone it all became plain. Modern houses use circuit breakers instead of fuses and these can  function when a bulb blows. many of them, for some reason have been fitted in garages, instead of being easily accessible in the house. It turned out that all the lights were working once we reset the circuit breaker. It must have disliked the way I switched the light on.

This, it seems, is an “improvement” on old-fashioned fuses which only blew when there was a fault.

The pen repair I performed, doesn’t seem to have worked. I now have inky fingers again.

However, my phone is now working better. I took out the SIM card and wiped it down. Had to use a safety pin to extract it as I can’t remember what I did with the extractor tool and wiped with a tissue instead of an eraser as I couldn’t find one. Phone now seems to be working and I booked an MOT slot.

Meanwhile, I had an editor email to accept two poems, and a  second to accept another. I’m ending the day with a smile, though I’m expecting to find a disaster lurking round the corner. That’s not pessimism talking, in case you are wondering, it’s experience.

One thing that has been driven home to me is that without a landline (they are being phased out in favour of a new and improved system) and without a decent mobile signal, it is hard to function in these modern times.

Pictures are just a selection from the week.

The Village Show

Well, it looks like I was wrong in two ways the other day. One was when I said in the comments that Julia was unlikely to win anything at the Village Show.

I thought I was safe as she rarely reads the blog (which is how I get away with some of the things I say about her). It seems I wasn’t safe. She even read the comments from that particular post, and instituted a rather frosty Q&A session about my lack of faith in her.

My second error, as you may be able to tell from the photos, was that she actually secured second and third place in her category. The category was Acrylic. There were five entries. The winner was a landscape which looked like it could be used on the lid of a box of chocolates. It was not my cup of tea, but it was a skilful painting. The two pictures that were unplaced were a similar landscape by the painter of the first placed picture and a painting of the late David Hockney with one of his recent paintings as a background.

This was the third place painting, a close-up of a swan’s head. The comments on the back of the card liked the composition and the choice of subject.

This is the second place picture – two pigeons looking at something. The comment was that the judge loved the composition and wonders what they are looking at.

I can assure him that the effect does not wear off. We’ve had it in the living room a few weeks now and I still feel uneasy about the way they are watching me.

So there you go, a good day at the village show in 2026. Next year I really must make some chutney.