
Marmalade Hoverfly. Misleading name, they are not good on toast
I made an interesting discovery on my voyage of self-discovery and organisation yesterday. I’ve been doing quite well at doing the basics of my daily plan – emails, comments, read blogs, write a short post. In fact, I’ve done them every day. However, it suddenly occurred to me that these are the things I would have done nearly every day anyway, because they are the time-wasting displacement activities I was trying to avoid. Yes, I now only do them once or twice and then get on with something else, but they are still there and still wasting time.
However, I need to check emails, comments etc, and I need to write a bit for practice, so I can’t stop doing them. What I can stop doing is congratulating myself for doing them as part of my plan. I’m now not allowed to congratulate myself until I’ve done something useful.
Here’s a link to my new article on Cromwell’s Head on the Peterborough Military History Group Website. I can’t seem to link to it directly, but if you go to the website and then the Research Page you should get it.
Of course, the posthumous misadventures of the head of a regicide/political visionary (other interpretations are available . . .) may not be your sort of story, in which case you can move on to more mutterings about things that don’t matter.

National Trust jam
The lack of quality standards for marmalade, for instance. A couple of times a month we need marmalade. There are currently 14 types of marmalade available from TESCO. Some are basically clear orange jelly with a hint of orange and a lot of sugar and chemicals. They can be as little as 85p per jar. Or they can be up to £3.30 a jar. The cheap jar, by the way, is 454g and the expensive jar is only 370g. Some are only 340g. Surprisingly, all the marmalades, regardless of price, seem to score highly in the reviews. The ones i think of as better quality, which have big pieces of orange peel in them, do not last as long, because of the big chunks of peel.
There should, first of all, be a standard jar, so you can compare them properly. Then there should be a grading system. There are standards. The UN Standards are here, for instance. However, I’m not convinced they are mush help when shopping for marmalade. I’m sure the marmalade of the world is in safe hands, but the definitions don’t help with establishing value for money.
Some of the expensive marmalades seem nutritionally almost identical to the cheap ones when you look them up. The only difference is in the flavour (which could be produced artificially) and the size of the orange peel pieces.

Toasted Teacakes
You can tell me it’s from Dundee or Oxford (these seem to be favourites), that it is bitter and/or chunky, though, to be fair, so am I, and that it is “Finest” None of these have any real meaning or legal standing. Dundee marmalade appears to be called that because it originated in Dundee. Oxford Marmalade originated in Oxford and uses some brown sugar in the mix. hardly rocket science is it?
I generally go for a mid-price marmalade, deluding myself it is better quality and that I am getting good value. I’m probably half-right on both counts. However, I am suspicious that it is actually the one with the highest profit-margin for the retailer, as that’s how this sort of thing seems to work.
And having tinged my breakfast with cynicism, I will go.
Did you know that one slice of toast and marmalade will take approximately 50 minutes to walk off. I do. I looked it up to stop myself going to the kitchen for toast and marmalade.

Plum Jam, I knew I had some (badly labelled) pictures somewhere