I took 425 photos last week, according to the count I just did. Exactly 200 were personal and 225 for work. I’m not surprised by the number of photos but I am surprised that they worked out to such tidy figures.

Cook Islands $1 – gold-plated copper with coloured detail
Of those, about half a dozen are blurred (as I delete obviously faulty ones at the time of taking, if I can) but many are poorly composed, badly lit or simply duplicates to make sure I get a decent shot.Many of the work shots are poorly lit because the subjects, particularly coin sets in boxes, and the lights (a couple of badly placed fluorescent tubes) aren’t really designed for good photography.

Guernsey 50p – much the same as the previous photo – they never circulate and are really just medallions for people who want lots of bright shiny stuff

And again!
It was a dull week at work – just coins. medallions and the cards that go with them. The “house style” so far as we have such a thing, is also dull, as the shop owner doesn’t like shots which might be more interesting than average. That’s a shame, as I like to look for slightly more interesting angles. Apart from taking pride in my work, it breaks up the tedium of taking 225 photos of shiny, round things.
The other problem I have with him is that he doesn’t use a camera himself. This means he doesn’t understand lighting, or the way the camera sees the shot, particularly the colour rendition. He can’t see why we can’t replicate the picture his eye sees. Most of the time we get decent shots, but with a good camera, good lighting and with some decent equipment such as tripods and diffusers, we could do a lot better.
This is a medallion to mark the 75th Anniversary of the Spitfire’s First Flight.
A lot of them have to be photographed inside plastic capsules, which doesn’t help.You can’t win with that one. If you take a proof coin out of a capsule you get criticism for taking it out and, in the view of the critic, putting finger marks on the coin. If you leave it in you get questions about whether a scratch is on the coin or the capsule.

Crowns – from the Festival of Britain 1951 to Wedding of Charles & Diana 1981
So here are a few of last week’s coin and medallion photos. Not really much of a challenge, apart from the poor equipment, and not much of a feeling of a job well done either. It’s fortunate I have a blog to keep me going.
I sympathise. Indoor photography is tricky in my view.
With a DSLR, a decent flash, some bean cans for height, a tripod, a spirit level and a tracing paper diffuser it seemed quite simple. 🙂
Does the owner read the blog?
Not as far as I know. 🙂
🙂
That’s a heck of a lot of photos, anyway you look at it.
With digital photography it’s so cheap that I just fire away. 🙂
I do a similar thing.
🙂
That is quite a few photos! And they weren’t even photos of robins! 🙂
I will try harder. 🙂