Tag Archives: lessons from history

Lessons from History

I wanted to see the heron again

It was the monthly meeting of the Peterborough Military History Group this week and the talk was about the Great War in Serbia with particular reference to six female soldiers and a boy who all fought with distinction. It was quite an eye-opener. I knew the basics, but wasn’t aware that the massacre of Serb civilians was commonplace during the occupation. or that there had been so many female soldiers in the Serbian Army. That’s why history is important. Although I knew there were problems between Balkan states, I hadn’t realised that Serbia had lost between 21 and 27% of its population during the war, including the systematic massacre of civilians by the Central Powers. There was also quite a problem with Albania in the Great Retreat. In the retreat King Peter, veteran of three previous wars and a guerilla campaign, led the civilian column, walking every step of the way and refusing to ride a horse as others had to walk. He was 71 years old. You can see why his people venerated him.

I’m practicing to be artistic. 

The “boy” of the talk’s title, Momčilo Gavrić “enlisted” at the age of eight when his parents, grandmother and seven siblings were killed by Croat troops of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He was adopted by an artillery unit and provided them with information on the location of the troops that committed the crime. The battery was able to open fire on the troops and they allowed him to fire one of the guns to take his revenge. He had an interesting life, but I’ll let you read the rest of it by following the link.

It was, as I say, an interesting talk, and shows what happens when generations of struggle breaks out into warfare, and why that warfare is more savage than you sometimes expect. However, the real question is, what can we do about breaking the cycle? The evidence I see today is not making me optimistic about peace, or even common sense.

Not tempted one of these into the garden yet . . .

 

Is Sitting an Activity?

Obviously I’m talking about a structured system of sitting with many active aspects . . .

Even I know the difference between that and loafing. Well, aimless loafing. I have no problem with creative loafing. I am, to the untrained eye, just sitting about dotting words on the an ethereal page, but I know it’s part of a long-running blog. I also know that I’ve been checking up egg recipes for breakfast and stoking up a case of incandescent rage by reading what passes as an agony aunt column. There are a lot of people who write questions which look like they have been suspiciously tailored to let their journalist mates rant on about various hot topics.

These are both things I need to do on a regular basis. Everybody needs breakfast. I think you can see this from an earlier post. I also need to remind myself that journalists are lazy and untrustworthy. They get paid loads of money just to sit down and write. It’s not hard. I’m doing it now. Apart from the being paid bit. They have huge resources and a dedicated web of sneaks and snitches, and they are being taken to the cleaners by Prince Harry at the moment.

In any decent society he wouldn’t be allowed near a court of law with his whining, self-serving, look-at-me sob story. If our journalists were any good they would have nailed him years ago and he’d be living as a recluse in a cold and draughty country on something resembling the average wage, not a $16,000,000 mansion in California with the American media feeding his vanity and raining cash on him.

It would be just him, his creepy Uncle Andy, and a ring of steel to keep them away from decent people. And probably a couple of those ankle bracelets. They would have to cook for themselves, run their own baths and ruminate on how it could all have been so different. They were both acclaimed as war heroes and they both married women who were well-liked for a time. What would have happened if Andrew had been allowed to marry Koo Stark, for instance, or if Harry hadn’t decided on a tell-all memoir to cash in? You’d have thought the Royal family would have learnt a lesson from the Peter Townsend fiasco.

All of which brings me to the uncomfortable conclusion that they are victims of their birth, and my views might be a trifle uncharitable. However, it is undisputable that in the old days peter Townsend was a proper hero and Princess Margaret had a sense of duty that some of the younger royals would do well to study.

Yes, sitting. It is definitely an activity if done properly.

Haddock Special at the Fishpan, Scarborough

The pictures have nothing to do with the subjects. Sorry about that.