Looking through the old photographs, as I was yesterday, I am reminded of the complexity of regulations around photography.
Care Bears came to visit
I have photographs of children and vulnerable people and I have permission to use them. So I’m clearly OK to post them on the blog aren’t I? Well, no. According to some regulation, which may be data protection rather than safeguarding, I should have asked for time-limited permission and I shouldn’t use them indefinitely. Schools, for instance, are only supposed to use photographs of children while they are attending the school. This would tend to suggest that I shouldn’t use the images now we have closed down.
This suggests that even if you are lucky enough to get a decent shot of a child you can’t keep using it. Unless you’ve paid a child model – that will be OK. That’s one anomally. Another is that I can’t publish names, but newspapers can. Presumably predatory perverts only cruise amateur blogs – professional photos and newspapers hold no interest for them.
The Quercus Group in disguise
There’s another anomally – if I want to take pictures of children on a visit I need permission, which some schools take more seriously than others. We once had a teacher shouting at one of our group members because they had taken a picture with their telephone, which might have included a school pupil.
Yet that teacher thought it was OK for the school to take pictures of the visit without asking our permission and without checking with the vulnerable adults in the group. In fact no school ever asked permission to take pictures.
I’m not saying they should do, but I am saying that there should be one rule for everyone, particularly for schools that insisted on coming on days when the group was in. Julia, being soft-hearted always resisted my requests that we should have a photo permission form for visits and only give permission to groups who gave us permission.
It’s funny how a train of thought can rise from a few photos…
Agroforestry project
Imagine what that would mean for the famous Pears Soap advert. They used this one for years. Oh, how Admiral Sir William Milbourne James GCB must have mentally thanked his grandfather for this portrait of him in green velvet as he strode the decks of his various commands, where he was known by the nickname “Sir Bubbles”.
Image downloaded from the website of the Victoria and Albert Museum, with permission. Despite a lack of medals and dead animals this kind gesture has elevated thm to the status of one of my favourite museums.
I rarely take pictures of people because I find it embarrassing to point cameras at them. (Matilda is an exception as she likes being photographed)
Yes, it can be embarrassing. I even get embarrassed about people watching me take pictures, though I’m getting better at ignoring them.
Tricksy!
🙂
I can’t get my drunken reindeer to stay still long enough for a picture!
https://pacificparatrooper.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/merry3.gif
That is an excellent reindeer! 🙂
But, I wonder, can he fly? 🙂
I imagine so, he looks capable of anything
Good answer!!
Thank you.
I often wonder about issues like this when I take a picture of a busy street and then use it in a post!
Tricky subject – as I understand it we should be OK doing that but I also know it’s not quite as simple as that.
I try to avoid close ups and faces as much as possible, though it’s a shame we can record everyday events because we worry about such things.
About 40 years ago I was stopped from photographing two of my own children in a public swimming pool
I suppose we should be grateful that people are looking out to keep children safe, though it can be over the top.
Yes
To be honest, you look much more trustworthy in a beard.
🙂